Add whitelabel option
complete
S
Sahil Suman
Merged in a post:
White label + split payment between VAPI & dev
M
Matthieu GARCIA
I would like to know if it is possible to add a function on the white label and sub-accounts;
At the end of the month, the customer pays for his consumption (1 payment) :
→ What is due to VAPI goes directly to VAPI
→ What is due to the SaaS agency goes directly to the agency
This way, agencies don't have to collect money from the customer, then pay VAPI, keeping the difference.
This could take the form of an affiliation (between VAPI and us).
Let's take an example:
→ the SaaS agency charges €100/month, regardless of its customer's actual consumption.
If the latter consumes €200, he must therefore pay €300 (€200 to VAPI and €100 to the SaaS agency). The customer only pays once (300€), and payment is directly split between VAPI and the agency.
This could make SaaS agencies' accounting a lot easier, while at the same time allowing them to integrate affiliation at market prices. Especially for independent developers, of which there are many, including me.
I have a contact at PayPal (the EMEA main manager) who could help you with a dedicated team. I've already worked with them in the past. For sure they will be helpful.
Please find attached an illustrative diagram
Matthieu
S
Sahil Suman
complete
We’ve teamed up with Chat-Dash to tackle this issue. Check out the docs here: https://docs.vapi.ai/providers/chat-dash
Also, there are plenty of other tools that can do this too. Just hop on YouTube and search for "vapi whitelabel" to explore your options
Canny AI
Merged in a post:
(SAAS) setting my own price per minute and white labeling
L
Lenov Carbon
If you will add white labeling and sperate payment methods for each assistant it will help ai agencies a lot
Especially if you will add possibility of setting my own cost per minute so costumer can directly pay in vapi but my additional costs will go to my vapi wallet that i will be able to withdrawal any time
Thank you
Slava Kurilyak
+1 for white-labeling as this would unlock new partnership opportunities for Vapi and allow Vapi users to unlock benefits without relying on third-party solutions like Vapify (vapify dot agency) and Voicerr (voicerr dot ai)
C
Cristián Vera
1000%
Justin Chapman
100%
E
Ed Preble
By definition, Voice API is already white label. It's the nature of an API.
Sean Hynes
I think this should be postponed to wait on core, it will create so much support for the some smaller accounts, which is better after a much more mature product.
R
Ritesh Chopra
This is an important feature for us.
T
Tylan Miller
I beg of Vapi not to focus on this to much, and focus on the core product. The only reason people want "WL" is becuase they are in the High Level ecosystem. The ecosystem for Vapi is already great to build on - meaning people can already develop WL solutions. Just the dashboard should be focused on. No connection with High Level and etc. People can just iframe the WL page in the High Level account.
C
CFive Administrator
Tylan Milleryeah bad
Max Melchior Lang
Tylan Miller Totally agree with this! API and Dashboard combi is perfect. Everything on a higher level will just be clunky.
p
pixodelpro
Tylan Miller Totally agree
Load More
→